<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>blog.thinfilms.org &#187; cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.thinfilms.org/tag/cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.thinfilms.org</link>
	<description>anthropology &#124; media ecology &#124; mythology &#124; tinkering &#124; visual literacy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:54:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; shapah! 2010 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/</copyright>
	<managingEditor>chad@thinfilms.org (chad calease)</managingEditor>
	<webMaster>chad@thinfilms.org (chad calease)</webMaster>
	<category>shapah</category>
	<ttl>1440</ttl>
	
	<itunes:subtitle></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:summary>the sound of things going juuust right</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:keywords></itunes:keywords>
	<itunes:category text="Society &#38; Culture" />
	<itunes:author>chad calease</itunes:author>
	<itunes:owner>
		<itunes:name>chad calease</itunes:name>
		<itunes:email>chad@thinfilms.org</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<itunes:block>no</itunes:block>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="http://www.shapah.net/wp-content/plugins/podpress/images/powered_by_podpress_large.jpg" />
		<item>
		<title>Cinematography: We&#8217;ve come a long way?</title>
		<link>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2010/05/cinematography-weve-come-a-long-way-or-have-we/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2010/05/cinematography-weve-come-a-long-way-or-have-we/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 04:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beauty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual literacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edwin S. Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sight and sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silent film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Train Robbery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Edison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1425496493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


We don&#8217;t have to ask why we love videos and movies, visual literacy is becoming more important as time goes on.
Thinking about today&#8217;s conventions I see in contrast to the silent films of the early years of cinema, the first thing is obvious: there are a lot of talking heads. The cinematic elements that make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="hVlog" style="text-align: center">

</div>
<p>We don&#8217;t have to ask why we love videos and movies, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_literacy">visual literacy</a> is becoming more important as time goes on.<div id="attachment_2040" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 170px"><a href="http://blog.thinfilms.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/greattrainrobbery.jpg" rel="lightbox[2039]"><img src="http://blog.thinfilms.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/greattrainrobbery.jpg" alt="thinfilms greattrainrobbery Cinematography: Weve come a long way?" title="First Silent Movie, The Great Train Robbery (1903)" width="160" height="132" class="size-full wp-image-2040" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Produced by Thomas Edison and directed and filmed by Edwin S. Porter, The Great Train Robbery was the first narrative movie ever made.</p></div></p>
<p>Thinking about today&#8217;s conventions I see in contrast to the silent films of the early years of cinema, the first thing is obvious: there are a lot of talking heads. The cinematic elements that make me love movies, especially silent movies, are mostly lacking, having given way to VFX and complicated dialogue. Cool effects work well in the right places but, as we learned from the great, early filmmakers, a story is best told with a visual, artful use of the tools to lead us to make connections on our own. This is what cinematography is. The American Society of Cinematographers defines <strong>cinematography</strong> as:</p>
<blockquote><p>a creative and interpretive process that culminates in the authorship of an original work of art rather than the simple recording of a physical event.</p></blockquote>
<p>The difference between a good film and a great one is that even with the audio removed a great film stands on its own. The audience can still make sense of the action because the cinematic elements keep moving the story forward.</p>
<p>Silent films didn&#8217;t have the luxury of audio tracks to bolster what was happening on the screen. Directors worked feverishly to keep the inclusion of cards with words on them to a minimum as audiences often found them distracting because they broke a certain rhythm to the visual story that was unfolding before them. The fundamentals of editing were more than enough for directors in those early days as they saw a seemingly infinite number of conventions that could be used to craft atmospheres, psychological experiences that led audiences to emotional heights and dramatic lows in response to the visual sequences taking place in front of them. </p>
<p>In contrast to now, when a majority of popular films have so many stylistic choices in common, produced with technology that can shoot high and low, inside and out, leave no stone unturned, no thought of a character unknown, possessing perhaps a similar cultural rhythm about them, too, that can at times make them feel almost like the same movie. Technology has certainly opened up many more options for modern day shooters, myself included. Shooting with a Canon 5D Mark II allows us to shoot cinema quality footage at 24p at a fraction of the cost. However, as in design, there is a time and place for whitespace, which is to say, to not exploit the tools for all they&#8217;re worth just for the sake of exploiting the tools for all they&#8217;re worth. Does it add to the story? Yes? Keep it. Does it not add to the story? Lose it.</p>
<p>I surely don&#8217;t mean to discount the work of the great cinematographers of our age, only to suggest that limitations are what create the opportunities for innovation, not a lack of them. The life pursuits and soaring accomplishments of a legion of great screen directors in the early days of cinema stand testament to it. </p>
<p>So how has the rapid deployment of these new tools impacted our ability to tell a story cinematically? Surely it&#8217;s both helped and hindered. A great story is still a great story, regardless of what tools are used to tell it.</p>
<p><center><object width="480" height="385" align="alignright"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/69grwvuVEec&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/69grwvuVEec&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385" align="alignright"></embed></object></center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2010/05/cinematography-weve-come-a-long-way-or-have-we/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Conversation</title>
		<link>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2009/06/the-conversation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2009/06/the-conversation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recommendation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sight and sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene hackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the conversation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://shapah.net/?p=887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[


I had a brief chat *conversation* with a pal this morning about The Conversation:

colin
10:39
i never realized hackman could do THAT
c
10:39
his best film &#8211; period
he was great as lex luthor, too, tho ; )
colin
10:39
the final shot of him in the room
all alone
c
10:39
seriously
colin
10:39
all torn up
playing saxophone
that&#8217;s all he has left
raw nerves and a saxophone
forshadowed by his earlier [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="hVlog" style="text-align: center">

</div>
<p><a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e0/Theconversation.jpg" rel="lightbox[887]"><img alt="thinfilms Theconversation The Conversation" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/e/e0/Theconversation.jpg" class="alignleft" width="50" title="" /></a>I had a brief chat *conversation* with a pal this morning about <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Conversation">The Conversation</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
colin<br />
10:39<br />
i never realized hackman could do THAT</p>
<p>c<br />
10:39<br />
his best film &#8211; period<br />
he was great as lex luthor, too, tho ; )</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:39<br />
the final shot of him in the room<br />
all alone</p>
<p>c<br />
10:39<br />
seriously</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:39<br />
all torn up<br />
playing saxophone<br />
that&#8217;s all he has left<br />
raw nerves and a saxophone<br />
forshadowed by his earlier statement<br />
&#8220;i have nothing personal, nothing of value&#8221;<br />
DAMN<br />
and then&#8230;.<br />
fin<br />
the end<br />
that&#8217;s it!<br />
no happy ending<br />
no clean resolution<br />
no &#8220;justice&#8221;</p>
<p>c<br />
10:41<br />
that&#8217;s why i love it the MOST</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:41<br />
it just is</p>
<p>c<br />
10:41<br />
films with tidy endings are nice<br />
but my favorites don&#8217;t seem to have them</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:41<br />
yes<br />
you have to make the ending yourself<br />
what is hackman going to do?<br />
was han solo really aligned w/ the girl the whole time?</p>
<p>c<br />
10:42<br />
lol<br />
&#8220;you&#8217;re not supposed to feel anything. You&#8217;re just supposed to do it&#8221;</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:42<br />
yes<br />
&#8220;all I want is a nice fat recording&#8221;<br />
if that movie was made nowadays<br />
it would have a huge car chase scene<br />
and some weird heroine with a cat<br />
and it might actually be called &#8220;assassins&#8221;</p>
<p>c<br />
10:44<br />
totally<br />
not enough dressing ie double-glazing</p>
<p>colin<br />
10:44<br />
the whole movie was brimming with raw nerves though<br />
usually when I&#8217;m watching films on the road i have it in a smaller window while I research shit in the bg<br />
but not this time<br />
totally sucked in
</p></blockquote>
<p><center><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vrhRsZ56b4g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vrhRsZ56b4g&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></center></p>
<p>=<br />
c</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.thinfilms.org/2009/06/the-conversation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
